Recently, I contacted my MP and the Mayor of Liverpool to share with them photos that I took of airplane trails over Liverpool. Please see the slideshow below, which includes the photos that I asked both politicians to look at.
In my email, I referred to the trails as ‘un-natural’ because I am certain that they are not just water vapour. I avoided the word ‘chemtrails’ because I did not want my concerns to be dismissed through the use of incorrect terminology. Invariably, the authorities seem to prefer to describe un-natural airplane trials as ‘persistent contrails’, which is nonsense because the persistent nature of flight generated condensation is a new and unexplained feature of modern jet engines.
Although I have gotten used to my MP no longer responding to my concerns, I was initially surprised and then disappointed to receive a reply from the Mayor of Liverpool. In his response, where he also copied my MP, he made the following statement.
“I believe the alleged action you are referring to is commonly known as chemtrails about which UK Government is clear that this does not occur in UK airspace.”
I was surprised by this response because the standard approach seems to be to ignore the concerns of the public. I was disappointed because the above sentence is so dismissive. However, it is a sentence that needs to be analysed in more detail.
First, the Mayor of Liverpool acknowledges the term ‘chemtrails’. This is very significant and I believe that it happened because it is a term in such high usage that it can no longer be avoided.
Second, the Mayor says that it is an ‘alleged action’. In other words, it is a claim that has not been proven. However, the flipside of such a statement is that it is a claim that has not been disproven.
Third, the Mayor says that the ‘UK Government is clear that this does not occur in UK airspace’. This is very significant because he has gone from describing it as an ‘alleged action’ to something that ‘does not occur in UK airspace’. Why has he qualified the statement by referring to UK airspace? Surely, if it is just a ‘conspiracy theory’, it does not occur in any air space. You could argue that this is because the Government is only concerned with activities within the UK’s jurisdiction. The problem is that this is not true. The UK Government is concerned with overseas activities as much as it is about what is happening within our shores. This is particularly true where such activities can have a potentially negative impact on the British Isles. The UK government is party to many international treaties and so it takes an active interest in monitoring them. One of those treaties is to do with weather modification for military purposes, where countries have agreed not to undertake such actions, unless it is for domestic research purposes.
Fourth, the Mayor has quoted the government line on this matter. He says that the ‘UK Government is clear that this does not occur’. The problem here is that the Mayor was presented with evidence and his response was not to examine that evidence but to refer to what he has been told is the ‘truth’. He has not used his own mind to look at the photographs and to ask questions. He has just dismissed what he sees before him because he trusts that the Government is the one and only source of what is true and what is real. How ridiculous?
Fifth, what we see here is a political conspiracy that involves both central and local government. There is an official line on everything and it will be referred to in response to any queries raised by the public. Whoever you approach on a matter, whatever avenue you choose to pursue, the State will always have the final say. Un-natural airplane trails are all in the imagination. Shut up and go away. The political conspiracy is so deep that no-one thinks for themselves anymore and that is how the authorities want it. You will be told what is true and what is false and you will accept it.
Finally, it is worth noting that I asked my MP and the Mayor of Liverpool to look beyond what they were told, to look at the facts and to consider their place in history. In particular, I said the following.
“You are both public servants and I believe that you have a duty to err on the side of caution, particularly when it is a matter of public health. Do you want to go down in history as the politicians that were too ideologically blinkered to see what was actually going on? Do you want to go down in history as the politicians that failed the people of Liverpool because you could not accept the idea that something may be happening that contradicts the official line? Do you want to go down in history as being so belligerent on this matter that you were prepared to put the health of your constituents at risk from whatever chemicals are being sprayed into the air?”
Modern government is a conspiracy because the general public is no longer involved in the key decisions that affect every person’s quality of life. Modern government is a conspiracy because the politicians are just instruments of an inhuman State, which has superseded democracy and common law in favour of elitism, fascism and tyranny. Modern government is a conspiracy because the interests of the few are pursued at the expense of everyone else.
The last thing that I said to my MP (Louise Ellman) and the Mayor of Liverpool (Joe Anderson) on the matter of airplane trails is below.
“If you would at least take the time to observe what is happening in the skies above you, ask pertinent questions and conduct investigations, then you will have fulfilled your duty to your constituents but to ignore the subject altogether would be criminal. It would also be a matter of public record.”
Now, it can be said that this is a matter of public record. When the truth does eventually come out, politicians need to be held to account for their shameful inaction and total incompetence.