When I really started paying attention to aircraft trails over Liverpool, I tried to work out where the planes were coming from and going to. The best that I could do to narrow down the locations, was to realise that many of the planes seemed to operate out of North Wales. Also, I noticed that the planes were not commercial aircraft, even though they did look like passenger jets. Oddly, they never seemed to fly at high altitude and their strange manoeuvres suggested to me that they could not be from standard airports; they could only be flying from private or military airfields.
The closest North Wales airfield to Liverpool of any significance is Broughton, which is near the town of Hawarden. It is also referred to as Chester Airport because of its close proximity to the ancient walled city. The Broughton site was established during the Second World War and is now operated by the Airbus Group. Historically, the site’s security has been provided by the MoD but it is now under the control of the North Wales Police. Many airfields around the UK naturally have links to the Ministry of Defence (MoD) through their history with the Royal Air Force (RAF). As such, many aircraft manufacturers and defence contractors have also been established at these sites, for matters of convenience and security. The question we now need to ask is whether the MoD is using these airfields and its relationships with the on-site manufacturers, as the method by which to release contaminants into the air and onto the unsuspecting public below? The strange thing about Broughton is that within its perimeter, there is a manufacturing company that has nothing to do with aircraft parts or components. The company is called Altitude Aluminium and it specialises in the production of aluminium windows and doors. Maybe this has come about because of Broughton’s post war history, where prefabricated aluminium bungalows were produced by a company called Vickers. Nevertheless, it does seem highly unusual that such a company should operate from within the controlled security border. In other words, you cannot just walk up to its reception; you have to pass through a military style check point first. This would not be controversial if aircraft trails were not associated with the release of aluminium particulates around the world. There are numerous claims that aluminium is used to produce the expanding persistent white trails, which are subsequently contaminating the rainwater and the soil. I am not saying that this particular (and rather bizarrely named) company is doing anything wrong but it is an extraordinary set of circumstances. Strangely, there is also a car restoration company operating within the perimeter but it does not specialise in aluminium products. Whatever the reasons are for the current arrangement at Broughton airfield, it is a shame that we know longer have investigative journalists in the UK who are prepared to dig a little deeper on such matters, when it is clearly in the public interest to do so.
0 Comments
If aeroplanes are spraying substances into UK air space, without the knowledge or consent of its citizens, then it stands to reason that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) must be aware of these activities, as it is the organisation tasked with protecting the UK.
All planes in the UK require a flight plan and approval to take to the air. Therefore, if someone were to embark on a flight with malicious intent, such as releasing harmful agents into the atmosphere, then you would think that the MoD would want to know about it, would take such a threat seriously and would do everything that it could to prevent such an attack from happening. In fact, given the current climate, where we are told to be mindful that others intend to harm us and where vigilance is encouraged, you have to wonder why the MoD does not regard the unauthorised dispersal of unknown contaminants into UK air space to be a problem. The only conclusion that I can come to, is that the MoD is unconcerned because it is fully aware of what is happening. The MoD’s claims to the contrary are as reliable as its accounting practices. If you look at the latest set of Annual Reports and Accounts for the MoD (2014-2015), there is a revealing comment by Sir Amyas C. E. Morse within Chapter 6: Certificate of the Comptroller And Auditor General. In a section at the top of page 105, titled ‘Basis for Qualified Opinion on Financial Statements’, the following is noted about the reliability of the MoD’s accounts: The Department does not hold records to enable compliance with the Financial Reporting Framework and account for the expenditure, assets and liabilities arising from certain contracts in accordance with International Accounting Standard 17, Leases. Consequently, I have concluded that the Ministry of Defence has omitted a material value of leased assets and lease liabilities from its Statement of Financial Position as at 31 March 2013, 31 March 2014 and 31 March 2015. This has also led to a material misstatement of the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure for 2013-14 and 2014-15 and Statement of Parliamentary Supply for 2013-14 and 2014-15. I am unable to quantify the impact on the financial statements because the Ministry of Defence has not maintained the records or obtained the information required to comply with International Financial Reporting Standards in this respect. This is a minor statement given the overall size of the report but it is significant because it basically says that the accounts are not accurate because appropriate records have not been kept and that this has been the case for the last three years and so is still likely to be the case today. All we know is that it applies to certain unspecified contracts, resulting in an omission of 'material value', such that the 'impact' on the 'financial statements' is 'unquantifiable'. It is nothing short of a scandal. According to the Serious Fraud Office, the general criminal offence of fraud can include:
Is it not reasonable to ask if criminal activity is taking place at the MoD, for all three of the reasons listed above? Furthermore, if that is the case, could the MoD be concealing other on-going criminal activities, such as the operations responsible for aeroplane trails? Is it any wonder that people distrust claims from those in authority that nothing suspicious is happening in UK air space? The people in the UK have been far too trusting for far too long and it is no good for authorities to just assert that something is not happening. It needs to be demonstrated to an independent team of auditors with scientific legitimacy, who can undertake the necessary tests and who will have unrestricted access to the airports and airfields where the planes originate from.
Recently, I added a Links page to this site The aim is to provide alternative sources of information on items related to this blog.
At the top of the list has to be the Agriculture Defense Coalition, co-founded by Rosalind Peterson. I became aware of this site after seeing a video of Rosalind making a presentation to the United Nations on weather experiments and aeroplane trails. Rosalind presents a compelling case, which I think will earn a place in history. I advise everyone to watch this video and to then ask yourself why the mainstream media has failed to investigate Rosalind's claims, or even to report on them in the first place. In October 2014, I wrote to my M.P. (Louise Ellman) about the prevalence of aircraft trails over Liverpool. Below is a copy of the main body of the email that I sent and the questions that I asked.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Ms Ellman, I live in the Liverpool Riverside constituency and seek your help on a matter that causes me a great deal of concern. Throughout the summer months, I became very aware of aircraft that were flying over Liverpool and leaving trails of a substance that lingers in the air and expands. Furthermore, the aircraft turn around and repeat the process, until the sky is a mess of intersecting flight trails that form a lattice of a slowly expanding material, until the sky is just a haze. The flights that I saw were operational either in the morning or in the evening, and on days when it was noticeably sunny. They also seem to originate, in many cases, from North Wales. The fact that this is happening is indisputable. However, I have a number of questions that I seek answers to, because I believe that what is happening is unlawful and potentially hazardous to health. As a member of parliament, responsible for the area in which I live in, I assume that this is something that you are aware of. If not, then you will have the means to find out what is going on. We know that the government conducted experiments on the UK population in the past. Millions were in germ war tests The questions that concern me are:
I also hope that you will support me, should I choose in the future, to distribute leaflets to the people of Liverpool, so that they are aware of what is happening in the skies above them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
CategoriesArchives
January 2018
|